| Ricci Street
< Port 80 < Boardwalk || search | sitemap | help gazette | theater | bistro |
| | |
|
|
barrier to entry |
incumbents |
new entrants |
| economies of scale |
burden of distributing atoms |
incremental cost of bits is negligible |
| capital requirements |
ROI demands of shareholders and parent conglomerates |
low R&D, low advertising |
| access to distribution channels |
Internet is not ubiquitous; copyright infringement claims and lawsuits to control channel |
regulatory arbitrage |
| product differentiation |
top brands; mindshare |
content is exact; no analog loss |
| switching costs |
|
short "free" downloads; no travel |
| cost disadvantages |
top talent under contract; catalogs of copyrights |
innovative, still immature |
| government policy |
some laws, regulations, and courts support copyright infringement claims that control distribution channel |
FCC; no taxes |
The Internet As
A Source Of Regulatory Arbitrage
A. Michael Froomkin
University of Miami, 1996
The Internet is a transnational communication medium. Once connected, there is little that a single country can do to prevent citizens from communicating with the rest of the world without drastically reducing the economic and intellectual value of the medium. As a result, connection to the Internet enables regulatory arbitrage by which persons can, in certain circumstances, arrange their affairs so that they evade domestic regulations by structuring their communications or transactions to take advantage of foreign regulatory regimes. Regulatory arbitrage reduces the policy flexibility of nations by making certain types of domestic rules difficult to enforce.
Slyck - nav bar on left has comprehensive list
FastTrack - KaZaA, iMesh, Grokster
eDonkey, eMule, Blubster, BitTorrent, Earth Station 5, Ares
Gnutella
Shareaza
BearShare
Gnucleus
Morpheus
Swapper
XoloX Ultra
LimeWire
Phex
Streamcast Networks (Morpheus)
P2P United Members: Bearshare, Blubster, Grokster, eDonkey, Morpheus.com
Learn more about Ian Clarke's
Freenet and Bit
Torrent in the Future Frameworks section of Port 80's Charthouse.
See You on the
Darknet
by Paul Boutin
Slate, January 28, 2004
Why we don't really want Internet security.
No respite from the forces of darknet (N/A)
by Richard Waters
Financial Times (London), July 29, 2003
Here is a prediction: the darknet will never die.
Adversaries will send out their digital agents to hunt down its disciples. But
the darknet will go further underground, finding new ways to escape the reach of
these electronic attackers. The faithful will find safety by banding together in
small groups, beyond the reach of the oppressors.
The script for the next Matrix sequel? No — because the darknet is already here:
it is the unofficial side of the internet. And its resilience guarantees that it
will remain a thorn in the side of the music and movie industries, whatever
successes they may have in crushing its early manifestations.
DarkNet
by Edward W. Felten
Freedom to Tinker blog, November 25, 2002
Lots of buzz lately about the
DarkNet paper
written by four Microsoft Research people. The paper makes a three-part
argument.
First, there is really no way to stop file sharing, as long as people want to
share files.
Second, in the presence of widespread file sharing, a copy-prevention technology
must be perfect, for the presence in a file sharing environment of even a single
uncontained copy of a work enables anyone who wants to infringe its copyright to
do so. (This is what I call the "break once, infringe anywhere" model.)
Finally, there is little if any hope that a copy-prevention (or "DRM")
technology can be strong enough to prevent the creation of single uncontained
copies of works. So the conclusion is that the current DRM approach will not
work.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||