| Ricci Street
< Digital Wares < Lantern Lane < MBA 624
|| search | sitemap | help gazette | theater | bistro |
| | |
|
last update: June 26
Doug Anderson
Doug@RicciStreet.net
Bistro: Doug
Amr Abbas
Gary Constantino
Kevina Collins
Tim Dove
Keith Gaume
Taheerh Hulett
Katherine Joyce
Anne Schule
Hugo Sun
Tera White
Sean Collins
Tara Doster
Jon Gill
Colleen Hunter
Rick Mariano
Lemar Ward
|
Amr102573@aol.com
|
kevinacollins3@hotmail.com |
Sean Collinsseanbcollins@yahoo.com |
gc8734@chsbuffalo.org |
|
taradoster at hotmail.com |
IcedTD9@aol.com
|
![]() Keith Gaume |
jgill at medaille.edu
|
Taheerh Hulettrobiah104@adelphia.net |
Bistro: Colleeflower22 |
Katherine Joycekatherine_joyce1973@yahoo.com |
Rmariano@mower.com
|
|
als92280@aol.com
|
Hugo Sunhugo_sun@hotmail.com
|
Lemar Wardmrward54@hotmail.com |
Tera White
|
|
Dinner |
|
|
June 21 |
Doug |
|
June 28 |
Colleen and Rick |
|
July 5 |
Hugo and Tara |
|
July 12 |
Tera and Anne |
|
July 19 |
Jon and Tim |
|
July 26 |
Taheerh and Kevina |
|
August 2 |
Keith |
|
August 7 |
Amr and Sean |
|
August 9 |
Gary and LeMar |
Each of you will have most of an hour to help the rest of us learn about your future technology. Learn more
Five time slots for you doesn't leave a time in the middle for dinner, so I scheduled this for dinner later rather than earlier. I don't have a problem, however, with breaking for dinner after the second presenter if everyone is hungry.
[ title of training module ] For a provocative title, see Rick's on Aug 9 below.
|
6:15 - 7:00 |
Tim |
immersive environments: Haptic Force-Feedback Devices |
|
7:00 - 7:45 |
Kevina |
immersive environments: [ title of training module ] |
|
7:45 - 8:30 |
Jon and Tim |
dinner |
|
8:30 - 9:15 |
Colleen |
immersive environments: [ title of training module ] |
|
9:15 - 10:00 |
Sean |
smart things: Smart Life: Now or Later? |
|
10 - 10:30 |
discussion |
what you learned tonight |
imaging with a transparent object
MIT
scientists create fiber webs that see
by Eve Downing
MIT press release, July 6, 2006
In a radical departure from conventional lens-based optics, MIT scientists have developed a sophisticated optical system made of mesh-like webs of light-detecting fibers. The fiber constructs, which have a number of advantages over their lens-based predecessors, are currently capable of measuring the direction, intensity and phase of light (a property used to describe a light wave) without the lenses, filters or detector arrays that are the classic elements of optical systems such as eyes or cameras.
|
6:15 - 6:50 |
Tera |
immersive environments |
|
6:50 - 7:30 |
Anne |
telematics |
|
8:0 - 8:30 |
Keith |
dinner |
|
8:30 - 9:10 |
Tara |
telematics |
|
9:10 - 9:50 |
Taheerh |
biometrics |
|
9:50 - 10:30 |
Lemar |
biometrics |
|
6:00 - 6:40 |
Amr |
nanobots? |
|
6:40 - 7:20 |
Gary |
The future of the hospital room? |
|
7:20 - 8:00 |
Hugo |
optical software |
|
8:00 - 8:30 |
Gary and LeMar |
dinner |
|
8:30 - 9:10 |
Jon |
smart things |
|
9:10 - 9:50 |
Keith |
HD projection |
|
9:50 - 10:30 |
Rick |
The Future of Corporate Presentations: |
new feature at CNN.com - iReport
CNN Exchange invites YOU to connect with the news: Share your stories, your pictures, your videos wherever you see the I-Report logo.
Note that you can use your cell phone to send in the pictures.
Someone commented the other evening about the strength with which I profess my point of view. I would like to clearly articulate the ideas that I push the hardest because I think they're the hardest to grasp.
I don't want you to come out of this MBA program able only to run a business
profitably. I also want you to be change agents. That means that you can take
broken things and fix them. It also means that you can take things that aren't
broken, break them, and then either fix them or replace them.
Our progress as a species, to say nothing of our competitiveness as a country,
depends on repeated disruption and constant change. I hope, throughout your
careers, that you will be part of the forces driving both disruption and change.
Can the U.S.
remain competitive?
by Robert Samuelson
Buffalo News, August 9, 2006
One problem with these debates is that competitiveness is a vague term.
If it means keeping the lead in every industry where we once led, we're doomed.
...
Similarly, if competitiveness requires the United States to maintain its present
share of the world economy, we are also probably doomed. ...
The point: global economic growth - something the United States encourages -
erodes America's dominance. Technology, talent and wealth spread everywhere.
One possible "competitiveness" definition is the ability of countries to stay
ahead in developing new industries. By this standard, the United States is doing
well.
Are we safer and more secure with the Internet?
A New Enemy Gains on the U.S.
by Thom Shanker
NY Times, July 30, 2006
“We are now into the first great war between nations and networks,” said John
Arquilla, a professor of defense analysis at the Naval Postgraduate School, and
a leading analyst of net warfare. “This proves the growing strength of networks
as a threat to American national security.”
In a talk that Mr. Arquilla calls Net Warfare 101, he describes how traditional
militaries are organized in a strict hierarchy, from generals down to privates.
In contrast, networks flatten the command structure. They are distributed,
dispersed, agile, mobile, improvisational. This makes them effective, and hard
to track and target.
A net war differs from all previous wars, which were about brute confrontation
of forces, mass on mass — what Matthew Arnold called bloody contests of
“ignorant armies” meeting on the “darkling plain.”
Net war is the battle of the many, organized in small units, against
conventional militaries that organize their many into large units. These network
forces are not ignorant. They are computer literate, propaganda and Internet
savvy, and capable of firing complicated weapons to great effect.
This article is not available online for free, but you can learn more at:
Understanding Fourth
Generation War
by William S. Lind
Fourth
Generation Warfare - a terrific set of links at the end of this article
The
War on Terror
by Jay Dixit
Wired, August 2006
Shell-shocked troops are coming back from Iraq with snakes
in their heads. A new virtual reality treatment offers hope for vets. ...
The designers also used realistic noises: An A-10 plane sounds different than a
Black Hawk helicopter; a fractured bullet should buzz, while an intact bullet
should whistle. Subjects also stand on a “VR platform,” a carpeted wooden box
equipped with two metal diaphragms called BaseShakers. When a Black Hawk flies
overhead in the game, patients hear the hacking of its rotors and the snarl of
its engine. When mortars explode, the Base-Shakers vibrate so hard they blur
vision.
Then there’s the smell machine: a TiVo-sized box containing eight pressurized
chambers loaded with small capsules. A compressor shoots air into the chambers,
fans create a breeze, and the scent wafts in. Rizzo and his team licensed seven
smells from perfumeries: garbage, weapons fire, cordite, Iraqi spices, diesel
fuel, burning rubber, and body odor. (They’re hoping to add cooked lamb.)
As for NaturallySpeaking: if you’re already using Version 8,
it’s probably not worth upgrading to Version 9. Most people will find the
changes to be too few and too subtle.
But if you’re among the thousands who have abandoned dictation software in the
past, it’s a different story. Version 9 is a stronger argument than ever that
for anyone who can’t or doesn’t like to type, dictation software is ready for
prime time; the state of this art has attained nearly “Star Trek” polish.

Meet the Remote-Control Self
by Tim Hornyak
Wired, July 20, 2006
Android Clone
Wired News, July 20, 2006
Japanese roboticist Hiroshi Ishiguro clones himself, android-style. His incredibly lifelike mechanical double, "Geminoid HI-1," sometimes takes his place in meetings and classes.
HRD rubbishes MIT's laptop scheme for kids
Akshaya Mukul
Times of India, July 3, 2006
The HRD ministry has rejected the idea of 'one-laptop-per-child' (OLPC) being aggressively marketed by Nicholas Negroponte of MIT Media Laboratory. "India must not allow itself to be used for experimentation with children in this area," the ministry has said.
Learn more about this debate
Post your position statement at the Bistro so that the person rebutting you has something concrete to work with.
position statements at Bistro
|
6:00 - 6:15 |
Debate I - Technology |
|
|
6:15 - 6:25 |
Colleen |
Technology should be neutral / indifferent to current laws and business models. |
|
6:25 - 6:35 |
Rick |
|
|
6:35 - 6:45 |
Tera |
Technology should enforce current laws and extend current business models. |
|
6:45 - 6:55 |
Taheerh |
|
|
7:00 - 7:15 |
Debate II - Intellectual Property |
|
|
7:15 - 7:25 |
Jon |
IP (patents, copyrights) protection should be minimized. |
|
7:25 - 7:35 |
Anne |
|
|
7:35 - 7:45 |
Sean |
IP (patents, copyrights) protection should be maximized. |
|
7:45 - 7:55 |
Amr |
|
|
8:00 - 8:30 |
dinner by Taheerh and Kevina |
|
|
8:30 - 8:45 |
Debate III - Spectrum |
|
|
8:45 - 8:55 |
Kevina |
Spectrum should be treated as an abundant resource and a public good. |
|
8:55 - 9:05 |
Tim |
|
|
9:05 - 9:15 |
Katherine |
Spectrum should be treated as a scarce resource and a private good. |
|
9:15 - 9:25 |
Hugo |
|
|
9:30 - 9:45 |
Debate IV - Net Neutrality |
|
|
9:45 - 9:55 |
Gary |
The public Internet should be stupid. |
|
9:55 - 10:05 |
Tara |
|
|
10:05 - 10:15 |
Lemar |
The public Internet should be smart. |
|
10:15 - 10:25 |
Keith |
|
These are 10-minute statements. If you read yours, you should prepare at least 1,500 words, probably closer to 2,000 along with images (not text) for us to look at while we listen. (Old fogey alert: an 8 1/2 x 11 typewritten page has about 300 words. Thus, you should prepare at least 5 - 7 pages.)
position statements at Bistro
|
6:00 - 6:15 |
Debate I - Technology |
|
6:15 - 6:18 |
X rebuts Y - you and your partner decide after hearing and reading your opponents' positions |
|
6:19 - 6:21 |
|
|
6:21 - 6:24 |
|
|
6:24 - 6:27 |
|
|
6:27 - 7:00 |
Discussion |
|
7:00 - 7:15 |
Debate II - Intellectual Property |
|
7:15 - 7:25 |
|
|
7:25 - 7:35 |
|
|
7:35 - 7:45 |
|
|
7:45 - 7:55 |
|
|
7:30 - 8:00 |
Discussion |
|
8:00 - 8:30 |
by Amr and Sean, who will provide not only dinner but an ongoing commentary about President Bush. |
|
8:30 - 8:45 |
Debate III - Spectrum |
|
8:45 - 8:55 |
|
|
8:55 - 9:05 |
|
|
9:05 - 9:15 |
|
|
9:15 - 9:25 |
|
|
9:00 - 9:30 |
Discussion |
|
9:30 - 9:45 |
Debate IV - Net Neutrality |
|
9:45 - 9:55 |
|
|
9:55 - 10:05 |
|
|
10:05 - 10:15 |
|
|
10:15 - 10:25 |
|
|
10:00 - 10:30 |
Discussion |
These are 2- or 3-minute statements. You should feel free to write it out and read it to us, preferably while it's scrolling slowly by on the wall.
Success is the ability to go from failure to failure without
losing your enthusiasm.
-- Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
last updated: July 17
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|
Amr |
y | y | ||||
|
Gary |
y | y | y | y | ||
|
Kevina |
y | y | y | y | ||
|
Keith |
y | y | y | y | ||
|
Sean |
y | y | y | y | ||
|
Lemar |
y | y | ||||
|
Colleen |
y | y | y | y | ||
|
Hugo |
y | y | y | y | ||
|
Tera |
y | y | y | y | ||
|
Jon |
y | y | y | y | ||
|
Taheerh |
y | y | y | |||
|
Rick |
y | y | ||||
|
Tara |
y | y | y | |||
|
Anne |
y | y | y | y | ||
|
Tim |
y | y | y | y | ||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
1. your expectations of the course
2. describe your future
3. Edge, past inventions
4. Debate positions
5. Debate rebuttals
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||